-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
cancun #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cancun #13
Conversation
WalkthroughConfiguration update to use Cancun EVM version in Foundry and submodule dependency version bump for rain.solmem. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
foundry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
foundry.toml(1 hunks)lib/rain.solmem(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
- GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
- GitHub Check: rainix (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
lib/rain.solmem (2)
1-1: Cancun EVM upgrade is properly configured and verified.Verification confirms:
foundry.tomlcorrectly setsevm_version = "cancun"- No Paris-specific code or workarounds in the codebase that conflict with Cancun semantics
- The
rain.solmemdependency is properly locked (rev: f28da2f09d42d154783cb53c138a7ef2f3a9eb4a) and imports work correctly with CancunThe upgrade is complete with no compatibility issues detected.
1-1: Submodule commit f28da2f09d42d154783cb53c138a7ef2f3a9eb4a is already active and compatible with Cancun EVM.The repository's
foundry.tomlis already configured for Cancun EVM (evm_version = "cancun"), and no conflicting EVM version references were detected in the codebase. The submodule commit is the current version.foundry.toml (1)
9-9: Verify Solidity 0.8.25 and Cancun compatibility, and confirm tests pass.Changing the EVM version from Paris to Cancun may affect compilation behavior and runtime semantics. Cancun introduced new features (blob transactions, BLOBBASEFEE opcode, etc.) that could impact contract behavior or compatibility with dependencies.
Additionally, the PR description is empty with unchecked test items, so explicit verification is needed.
Please confirm the following before merging:
- Verify that Solidity 0.8.25 properly supports the Cancun EVM target.
- Confirm that all existing tests pass with the Cancun configuration.
- Verify that the
rain.solmemsubmodule version bump (c1c22cf → f28da2f) is compatible with Cancun and no breaking changes exist.- Check if any contract code needs adjustments for Cancun-specific behavior or new opcodes.
Consider providing motivation for the upgrade in the PR description (e.g., performance improvements, new features, security fixes, or alignment with ecosystem standards).
| @@ -1 +1 @@ | |||
| Subproject commit c1c22cf27963a9de0889ebf7f52869050f1fdfb9 | |||
| Subproject commit f28da2f09d42d154783cb53c138a7ef2f3a9eb4a | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fill out the PR description with motivation and context.
The PR description is empty with all checklist items unchecked. This violates basic PR requirements and makes it impossible to understand the rationale for the submodule update and EVM version change.
Please provide:
- Motivation: Why is the rain.solmem submodule being upgraded? What issues or features does it address?
- EVM version rationale: Why upgrade from Paris to Cancun? What benefits or requirements drive this change?
- Breaking changes: Document any potential impacts on existing contracts or deployments.
- Testing: Confirm that all checklist items have been addressed (unit tests, small PR size, issue/PR links, screenshots if applicable).
Motivation
Solution
Checks
By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.